Have been experimenting with a number of weather xml api's, have followed same process/logic for each and worked fine with a number of them but Wunderground API has me stumped.
$XML_WUNDER = simplexml_load_string('mylocalcopyofapiresponse.xml', null, LIBXML_NOCDATA)
print_r($xml_wunder);
Results in:
SimpleXMLElement Object
(
[version] => 0.1
[termsofService] => http://ift.tt/1c1wgoz
[features] => SimpleXMLElement Object
(
[feature] => forecast10day
)
[forecast] => SimpleXMLElement Object
(
[txt_forecast] => SimpleXMLElement Object
(
[date] => 11:20 PM NZST
[forecastdays] => SimpleXMLElement Object
(
[forecastday] => Array
(
[0] => SimpleXMLElement Object
(
[period] => 0
[icon] => sleet
[icon_url] => http://ift.tt/XfFTAM
[title] => Thursday
[fcttext] => A mix of wintry precipitation in the morning. Then periods of rain expected in the afternoon. High 37F. Winds N at 5 to 10 mph. Chance of precip 100%. Snow and ice accumulating 1 to 3 inches.
[fcttext_metric] => A mix of wintry precipitation in the morning. Then periods of rain expected in the afternoon. High 3C. Winds N at 10 to 15 km/h. Chance of precip 100%. 3-7cm of snow and ice expected.
[pop] => 100
)
[1] => SimpleXMLElement Object
(
[period] => 1
.....trimmed for brevity
The original response is as shown in the apigee console at the bottom of this page http://ift.tt/ULw8sn
I would expect
$xml_wunder->forecast->txt_forecast->forecastdays->forecastday[0]->fcttext_metric
To return:
A mix of wintry precipitation...........cip 100%. 3-7cm of snow and ice expected.
But get no response at all. This is on a page (xampp localhost) with two other weather xml api responses from different sources, all use same cache function and are identical in mark up, the others work as expected.
I suspect something to do with how the array is formatted as is not consistent with other api responses, leading to an error in my formatting. As such there's potentially a suitable answer out there, I'm just not aware of the terms to search for in order to get there.
Any pointers gratefully received.
No comments:
Post a Comment